Home
Retirement News
Retirement Forum
Introduction

Site Search
Article archives
Submit your article
XML News Feeds
Register
Login
Mailing List
Retirement News
401K
* 401k Articles
* 401k News
* 401k Help
* 401k Forum
Pension Protection Act
ERISA
Retirement Headlines
* Retirement Headline News
IRA
* IRA news
* IRA Rollover
Retirement Planning
* Retirement Planning News
529
* 529 News
Wealth Management
* Wealth Management News
Investment
* Investment News
Roth IRA
Roth 401k
* Guidelines and Rules
* Roth 401k Articles
* Roth 401k News
* Roth 401k Help
* Roth 401k Forum
SEP IRA
* Guidelines and Rules
* SEP IRA Articles
* SEP IRA News
* SEP Help
* SEP IRA Forum
SOLO 401k
* Guidelines and Rules
* Solo 401k Articles
* Solo 401k News
* Solo 401k Help
* Solo 401k Forum
SIMPLE IRA
* Guidelines and Rules
* SIMPLE IRA Articles
* SIMPLE IRA News
* SIMPLE IRA Help
* SIMPLE IRA Forum
 

The Social Security Dilemma

Posted by SEP-SOLO-IRA-401k-ROTH on: 2007-10-10 17:35:53 in category:
Retirement Planning [ Print | Permalink / 0 Comment(s) ]



Question: I'm 62 and still working. Is it better to take Social Security now or should I wait?

Answer: It depends on a lot of factors.

Social Security retirement benefits usually begin at full retirement age (FRA), which is currently age 65. For those born after 1937, FRA will be gradually increased until it reaches 67 for those born in 1960 or later. A worker can earn a larger benefit by continuing to work past their FRA. However, if you're willing to accept a permanently reduced benefit, you can collect as early as age 62. If your FRA is 65, taking retirement benefits at 62 will reduce your annual benefit by approximately 30%.

Generally speaking, if you're still working and you take Social Security, $1 of benefits is lost for every $2 or $3 you earn over an exempt amount. Since I don't know your income, I can't give you an accurate picture. I suggest you contact your tax adviser to see how taking Social Security at 62 while working could affect your tax bill. It may behoove you to wait a few years or until you stop working.

From my experience, people in poor health or with a short life expectancy may benefit from taking benefits at 62. Additionally, if you need the cash now, by all means take it. Conversely, if you don't need the money now, are in good health, and have a history of longevity in your family, you should at least consider postponing benefits a year or two to have a permanently higher amount down the road.

Bill's Bottom-line: If you think you'll live at least 15 years, consider taking benefits after age 62. If you think you'll live less than 15 years in retirement, consider taking benefits at age 62 or 63. More information is available by visiting the Social Security Administration website at www.ssa.gov.

�© 2007 Bill Losey, CFP�®, CSA

America's Retirement Strategist Bill Losey, CFP�®, CSA, has nearly 20 years experience in the financial planning industry. To learn more about Bill's services and to sign up for his FREE 30 page report, The 10 Biggest Mistakes People Make When Retiring and How to Avoid Them, visit Bill Losey Retirement Solutions

Post new Comment



This site does not allow anonymous comments. Registered members can login to participate. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds



 

Site Search

Search for in
Please support our sponsors *

Retirement Planning Made Simple -
Map out your future!


Experience the difference unbiased money management can offer you.....

Recent forum posts:

Solo 401-k

3%?

Hello from the SF area

Puerto Vallarta & Lake Tahoe--The Best of Both Worlds

Looking for the Best Place in the World to Retire?

How Do You Get to Paradise?

What’s Going on South of the Border?

Want to Find Treasure in the Sierra Madres?

fixed index annuities as funding vehicle for solo 401-k

Need advice

About this site
Powered by Esselbach Storyteller CMS System Version 1.8