Home
Retirement News
Retirement Forum
Introduction

Site Search
Article archives
Submit your article
XML News Feeds
Register
Login
Mailing List
Retirement News
401K
* 401k Articles
* 401k News
* 401k Help
* 401k Forum
Pension Protection Act
ERISA
Retirement Headlines
* Retirement Headline News
IRA
* IRA news
* IRA Rollover
Retirement Planning
* Retirement Planning News
529
* 529 News
Wealth Management
* Wealth Management News
Investment
* Investment News
Roth IRA
Roth 401k
* Guidelines and Rules
* Roth 401k Articles
* Roth 401k News
* Roth 401k Help
* Roth 401k Forum
SEP IRA
* Guidelines and Rules
* SEP IRA Articles
* SEP IRA News
* SEP Help
* SEP IRA Forum
SOLO 401k
* Guidelines and Rules
* Solo 401k Articles
* Solo 401k News
* Solo 401k Help
* Solo 401k Forum
SIMPLE IRA
* Guidelines and Rules
* SIMPLE IRA Articles
* SIMPLE IRA News
* SIMPLE IRA Help
* SIMPLE IRA Forum
 

Earliest Retirement with 100% Equity Portfolio?


Forum overview » Planning for early retirement » Earliest Retirement with 100% Equity Portfolio?



Roth-IRA-401k (moderator)
Posted 2006-12-06 13:45:29


Earliest Retirement with 100% Equity Portfolio?

I was asked by a client a similar question to this and I wanted other people form other investment perspective and risk tolerances to answer this.

If one's goal is to retire early, does it not make sense to invest in a 100% equity portfolio? This is my logic.

1) Historically, over the long term, equities have performed better than other assets.
2) Traditionally, 100% equity investors must worry that a down market will occur as they reach (effectively mandatory) retirement, thus forcing them to eat dog food. Thus, they must keep cash to ensure their portfolio will not crater in the period leading up to retirement.
3) If I am retiring early (especially if it will be very early), I have to option to delay retirement and continue working through a down market.
4) Thus, statistically speaking, on average retirement will occur earlier with a 100% equity investment. However, one must accept a relatively small potential for delayed retirement in order to obtain a larger chance of earlier retirement.
5) Just pulling numbers out of my rear, I look at it this way. Say a 30 year old traditional 60/40 investor has a 100% chance of retiring at 55 given their savings rate and expenses. With a 100/0 portfolio, they might have an 80% chance of retiring at 48 with a 20% chance of having to delay until 59. This decision is a no-brainier to me. (These numbers are demonstrative. I fully understand the math of probability distributions).
6) I have my money where my mouth is with a 95/5 portfolio for about 20 years (I need some emergency cash). My FA thinks I am crazy, and I did take a 25-30% hit in 2000-2002. OTOH, after about 20 years apiece in the market, he acknowledges that my net worth is much greater than his net worth, so I am doing something right.

Am I missing something? Who else uses this approach?[Edited by











[Edited by Roth-IRA-401k on 2006-12-06 13:50:03]


Legend



   View profile
   Mark this post as solution (topic starter only)
   Reply with quote to post
   Edit post
   Delete post (admin only)
Moderator: Open / Close / Bump / Delete / Move / Merge

Rate this thread:



 

Site Search

Search for in
Please support our sponsors *

Retirement Planning Made Simple -
Map out your future!


Experience the difference unbiased money management can offer you.....

Recent forum posts:

Solo 401-k

3%?

Hello from the SF area

Puerto Vallarta & Lake Tahoe--The Best of Both Worlds

Looking for the Best Place in the World to Retire?

How Do You Get to Paradise?

What’s Going on South of the Border?

Want to Find Treasure in the Sierra Madres?

fixed index annuities as funding vehicle for solo 401-k

Need advice

About this site
Powered by Esselbach Storyteller CMS System Version 1.8